ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography for assessing neovascularization of carotid atherosclerotic plaque

Evdokimenko AN, Chechetkin AO, Druina LD, Tanashyan MM
About authors

Research Center of Neurology, Moscow, Russia

Correspondence should be addressed: Anna N. Evdokimenko
Volokolamskoe shosse 80, Moscow, 125367; ur.ygoloruen@oknemikodve

About paper

Funding: this study was supported by Research Center of Neurology Government funding.

Acknowledgment: the authors thank Skrylev SI, Shchipakin VL and Koshcheev AYu (Vascular and Endovascular Surgery Unit, Research Center of Neurology) for providing biopsy specimens.

Author contribution: Evdokimenko AN — literature analysis, study design, data acquisition and interpretation, manuscript preparation; Chechetkin AO — literature analysis, study design, data acquisition and interpretation, manuscript revision; Druina LD — data acquisition; Tanashyan MM — study design, manuscript revision.

Received: 2019-08-15 Accepted: 2019-08-30 Published online: 2019-08-31
|
  1. Dunmore BJ, McCarthy MJ, Naylor AR, Brindle NPJ. Carotid plaque instability and ischemic symptoms are linked to immaturity of microvessels within plaques. J Vasc Surg. 2007; 45 (1): 155–9. DOI:10.1016/j.jvs.2006.08.072.
  2. Filis K, Toufektzian L, Galyfos G, et al. Assessment of the vulnerable carotid atherosclerotic plaque using contrast-enhanced ultrasonography. Vascular. 2017; 25 (3): 316–25. DOI:10.1177/1708538116665734.
  3. Gulevskaya TS, Morgunov VA, Anufriev PL. Struktura ateroskleroticheskih blyashek karotidnogo sinusa i narusheniya mozgovogo krovoobrashcheniya. Annals of Clinical and Experimental Neurology. 2010; 4 (1): 13–9. Russian.
  4. Tuhbatullin MG, Bayazova NI, Zakirzhanov NR, i dr. Primenenie kontrastnogo usileniya pri ul'trazvukovom issledovanii ateroskleroticheskoj blyashki v sonnyh arteriyah u pacientov s narusheniem mozgovogo krovoobrashcheniya. Prakticheskaya medicina. 2017; 103 (2): 124–9. Russian.
  5. Jeziorska M, Woolley DE. Local neovascularization and cellular composition within vulnerable regions of atherosclerotic plaques of human carotid arteries. J Pathol. 1999; 188 (2): 189–96.
  6. Saha SA, Gourineni V, Feinstein SB. The Use of Contrast-enhanced Ultrasonography for Imaging of Carotid Atherosclerotic Plaques: Current Evidence, Future Directions. Neuroimaging Clin N Am. 2016; 26 (1): 81–96. DOI:10.1016/j.nic.2015.09.007.
  7. Feinstein SB. The powerful microbubble: from bench to bedside, from intravascular indicator to therapeutic delivery system, and beyond. Am J Physiol Circ Physiol. 2004; 287 (2): H450–7. DOI:10.1152/ajpheart.00134.2004.
  8. Coli S, Magnoni M, Sangiorgi G, et al. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging of intraplaque neovascularization in carotid arteries: correlation with histology and plaque echogenicity. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008; 52 (3): 223–30. DOI:10.1016/j. jacc.2008.02.082.
  9. Hoogi A, Adam D, Hoffman A, Kerner H, Reisner S, Gaitini D. Carotid plaque vulnerability: quantification of neovascularization on contrast-enhanced ultrasound with histopathologic correlation. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011; 196 (2): 431–6. DOI:10.2214/ AJR.10.4522.
  10. Varetto G, Gibello L, Castagno C, et al. Use of Contrast- Enhanced Ultrasound in Carotid Atherosclerotic Disease: Limits and Perspectives. Biomed Res Int [Internet]. 2015; 2015 (Article ID 293163): [about 7 p.]. Available from: https://DOI. org/10.1155/2015/293163.
  11. van den Oord S, Akkus Z, Bosch J, et al. Quantitative Contrast- Enhanced Ultrasound of Intraplaque Neovascularization in Patients with Carotid Atherosclerosis. Ultraschall der Medizin — Eur J Ultrasound. 2014; 36 (02): 154–61. DOI:10.1055/s-0034-1366410.
  12. Feinstein SB. The Evolution of Contrast Ultrasound: From Diagnosis to Therapy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016; 67 (21): 2516–8. DOI:10.1016/j.jacc.2016.04.004.
  13. Moccetti F, Weinkauf CC, Davidson BP, et al. Ultrasound Molecular Imaging of Atherosclerosis Using Small-Peptide Targeting Ligands Against Endothelial Markers of Inflammation and Oxidative Stress. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2018; 44 (6): 1155–63. DOI:10.1016/j. ultrasmedbio.2018.01.001.
  14. Nacionalnye rekomendacii po vedeniyu pacientov s zabolevaniyami brahiocefal'nyh arterij. Angiology and vascular surgery. 2013; 19 (2) (suppl.): 1–72. Russian.
  15. von Reutern G-M, Goertler M-W, Bornstein NM, et al. Grading Carotid Stenosis Using Ultrasonic Methods. Stroke. 2012; 43 (3): 916–21. DOI:10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.636084.
  16. Gray-Weale AC, Graham JC, Burnett JR, Byrne K, Lusby RJ. Carotid artery atheroma: comparison of preoperative B-mode ultrasound appearance with carotid endarterectomy specimen pathology. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 1988; 29 (6): 676–81.
  17. Cattaneo M, Staub D, Porretta AP, et al. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging of intraplaque neovascularization and its correlation to plaque echogenicity in human carotid arteries atherosclerosis. Int J Cardiol. 2016; 223: 917–22. DOI:10.1016/j. ijcard.2016.08.261.
  18. Huang PT, Chen CC, Aronow WS, et al. Assessment of neovascularization within carotid plaques in patients with ischemic stroke. World J Cardiol. 2010; 2 (4): 89–97. DOI:10.4330/wjc. v2.i4.89.
  19. Iezzi R, Petrone G, Ferrante A, et al. The role of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in visualizing atherosclerotic carotid plaque vulnerability: which injection protocol? Which scanning technique? Eur J Radiol. 2015; 84 (5): 865–71. DOI:10.1016/j. ejrad.2015.01.024.
  20. Li C, He W, Guo D, et al. Quantification of carotid plaque neovascularization using contrast-enhanced ultrasound with histopathologic validation. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2014; 40 (8): 1827–33. DOI:10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2014.02.010.
  21. Staub D, Patel MB, Tibrewala A, et al. Vasa vasorum and plaque neovascularization on contrast-enhanced carotid ultrasound imaging correlates with cardiovascular disease and past cardiovascular events. Stroke. 2010; 41 (1): 41–7. DOI:10.1161/ STROKEAHA.109.560342.
  22. Xiong L, Deng Y-B, Zhu Y, Liu Y-N, Bi X-J. Correlation of Carotid Plaque Neovascularization Detected by Using Contrast-enhanced US with Clinical Symptoms. Radiology. 2009; 251 (2): 583–9. DOI:10.1148/radiol.2512081829.
  23. Müller HFG, Viaccoz A, Kuzmanovic I, et al. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging of carotid plaque neo-vascularization: accuracy of visual analysis. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2014; 40 (1): 18–24. DOI:10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2013.08.012.
  24. Shah F, Balan P, Weinberg M, et al. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging of atherosclerotic carotid plaque neovascularization: a new surrogate marker of atherosclerosis? Vasc Med. 2007; 12 (4): 291–7. DOI:10.1177/1358863X07083363.
  25. Huang R, Abdelmoneim SS, Ball CA, et al. Detection of Carotid Atherosclerotic Plaque Neovascularization Using Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2016; 29 (6): 491–502. DOI:10.1016/j.echo.2016.02.012.
  26. Thapar A, Shalhoub J, Averkiou M, Mannaris C, Davies AH, Leen ELS. Dose-Dependent Artifact in the Far Wall of the Carotid Artery at Dynamic Contrast-enhanced US. Radiology. 2011; 262 (2): 672–9. DOI:10.1148/radiol.11110968.
  27. Leo NDi, Venturini L, De Soccio V, et al. Multiparametric ultrasound evaluation with CEUS and shear wave elastography for carotid plaque risk stratification. J Ultrasound. 2018; 21 (4): 293–300. DOI:10.1007/s40477-018-0320-7.
  28. Meshcheryakova OM, Katrich AN, Vinogradov RA, i dr. Sravnitel'naya ocenka re-zul'tatov kolichestvennogo analiza ul'trazvukovogo issledovaniya s kontrastnym usileniem i patomorfologii v opredelenii stepeni neoangiogeneza v ateroskleroticheskih blyashkah. Ul'trazvukovaya i funkcional'naya diagnostika. 2018; (1): 43–59. Russian.
  29. Evdokimenko AN, Anufriev PL, Kulichenkova KN, Gulevskaya TS, Tanashyan MM. Morphometric characteristics of neovascularization of carotid atherosclerotic plaques. Arkh Patol. 2018; 80 (2): 24–9. DOI:10.17116/patol201880224-29. Russian.